By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy , and our Terms of Service. Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. It only takes a minute to sign up. A sea change. This was followed and is in many ways associated with [both Post-Positivism and] what came to be known as the pragmatic turn in philosophy. The later proponents of this movement came to be known as the New Pragmatists -- as distinguished from Rorty's Neo-Pragmatism. These would seem to constitute the most significant recent developments in anglophone analytic philosophy. But what sorts of things out there confer these enviable epistemic statuses on your beliefs? Your psychological perspective? Something else altogether? What kind of ontological beast, in other words, is a good reason for belief. Recently, however, many have started thinking of them as factive: good reasons for belief are either facts, veridical experiences, or known propositions. Does the movement represent a kind of reaction to above described philosophical movements and their deflation of the notion of Truth? Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Ask Question. Asked 4 days ago. Active 4 days ago. Viewed 43 times. This is exactly the question that Whiting asks in his review of Mitova's volume that you linked. And his conclusions are:" Insofar as knowledge is a central focus of epistemology by definition no less! I am suspicious of the suggestion that there really is a unified or distinctive movement or development in recent epistemology that deserves to be called a 'factive turn' To put it more bluntly, it is just a new buzzword. Conifold First, a "buzzword," jargon, for what? What do the adherents claim to be the salience of what they are up to. What is their project? Is it really epistemology, or is it more like semantics that they are on about? Conifold, please say a word or two about its ostensible relationship to what has come to be known as hinge epistemology. I noticed that one of the contributors, Duncan Pritchard, has also written a couple of papers in that area. That is: you gotta justify your skepticism. Philosopher of science Surprised you have not chimed in here. Provided a substantial answer to my query, which was directed to to you. Wittgenstein took his hinge propositions from Moore's direct realism, and On Certainty has been discussed for decades now. And, as Whiting complains, factivists do not even agree what counts as "good reason" for knowledge claims, or whether factivity is necessary for justification, or what facts are vs evidence. It is hard to see where the "turn" is or what it is supposed to be. Active Oldest Votes. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook.

Philosophy Nietzsche And Heidegger Time To Live And A Time To Give Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Douglas Bradbury Dermal Filler Complications A Clinicopathologic Study With A Spectrum Of Histologic Reaction Pattern Always And Forever New Essay Classification Of Modern Schools In England Value Of Education In The Good Earth Exploring The Idea Of Minimalism In Villa Tugendhat And Azuma House Transition From Childhood Into Adulthood College Admission Essay Importance Of Achieving Goals Definition Of Binge Drinking Shakespeare Example Essay Knife Of Never Letting Go And Wuthering Heights Essay Historical Context And Background Of Spanish Armada Defeat An Analysis Of The Game Of Lebron James The Best Player In The Nba Fordist And Taylorist Production Systems Cultural Studies New Essay Performance Appraisal In Human Resource Management Essay Re The Womens Liberation Movement Essay What Does The Bible Say About God Creator Essay Golf Book Vs Movie Disappointment In The Difference Judicial Affidavit Rule Three Reforms To Speed Up Justice Essay Help For People With Hypersomnia Disorder Essay Mcdonalds Progress And Performance Essay Cell Phone Addiction Definition Of The Concept Within The Two Perspectives Essay Critical Analysis Of Magazines In Jennifer Nelsons